Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Latest Draft Of Austin's Land Development Rules Permits Denser Housing, Loosens Parking Restrictions

Julia Reihs

The city has proposed allowing for denser housing while loosening parking requirements in its latest revamp of rules dictating what can be built in Austin and where. 

The draft proposal, released to the public Friday afternoon, also allows for accessory dwelling units anywhere you can build a home and outlaws the construction of a single-family home where one doesn’t already exist in "transition zones" – generally, areas with 500 to 700 feet of a busy main road. 

RELATED | After More Than A Yearlong Hiatus, Austin's Code Rewrite Returns. How Did We Get Here?

“Transportation, affordability, housing – [these are] all important issues to many residents," Annick Beaudet, assistant director of the Austin Transportation Department, said at a news conference at City Hall. "With this code, we are looking to simplify how we regulate, how we’re growing and guide growth where it can do the most good.”

This latest draft, which is more than 1,300 pages, comes after a tumultuous past two years discussing a new code. The effort resulted in a council vote to scrap the rewrite process, formerly dubbed CodeNEXT. The city has spent nearly eight years and more than $10 million trying to pass new land rules.

Council members reconvened in May, directing staff to come up with a code that could allow for at least 405,000 new housing units across the city, including 60,000 units affordable to a family of four making $75,500 a year or less. Many of these goals were established in the city’s first comprehensive housing plan, adopted in 2017.

Members also asked staff to do away with minimum parking requirements in parts of the city and to disincentivize the building of new single-family homes, with the hopes of providing denser and more diverse types of housing.

Staff say they've done that – with several tweaks here and there.

Initially, staff proposed outlawing the building of any new single-family homes in or near a "transition zone," but in the proposed code they backtracked a bit, now allowing single-family homeowners to demolish their homes and replace them with another single-family home. 

"If you're somebody that has a 900-square foot bungalow in a transition area, you can build it as a larger structure potentially,” said Brent Lloyd, development officer with the Development Services Department.

But someone could not tear down an apartment building, for example, and build a single-family home in its place.

People developing in and nearby designated "transition zones" would now have the choice to build parking, opting to build none only if they have an accessible sidewalk or are next on the city’s list for getting a sidewalk.

It was also important to Council members that the new code prepared the city for natural disasters. The draft asks that redevelopment of commercial properties include flooding infrastructure, such as drainage.

Staff also said they used updated floodplain regulations when considering where not to allow for denser development.

“In the code revision that we’re rolling out today, we actually used that 500-year floodplain as a basis to make sure we’re not upzoning in those areas,” said Matt Holland, an environmental planner with the city’s Watershed Department.

Volunteer group AURA, which advocates for denser housing and more transportation options, issued a mostly celebratory statement once the code had been released.

“The first draft of the new Land Development Code is a solid step in the right direction,” Kevin McLaughlin said in a statement. “While any new policy of such complexity and magnitude is bound to have issues, we believe that the first draft demonstrates the city’s commitment to making a more affordable and environmentally sustainable Austin with opportunities that are open to everyone.”

But Council Member Jimmy Flannigan warned his colleagues earlier this week of immediate reactions to a more than 1,000-page, complex zoning document.

“I want to encourage the community and my colleagues to not start sharing those inevitable blog posts and articles and posts that will certainly be very definitive about what’s in the document,” he said.

Last year, Mayor Steve Adler asked the Council to stop CodeNEXT, the former code rewrite process, after what he called “misinformation” on both sides.

In 2012, the Austin City Council approved a land code rewrite as part of Imagine Austin, a plan that lays out how the city should grow over the next several decades. Essential to accomplishing these goals – the primary being to build a “compact and connected” city – was to redo the city’s land development code.

Audrey McGlinchy is KUT's housing reporter. She focuses on affordable housing solutions, renters’ rights and the battles over zoning. Got a tip? Email her at Follow her on Twitter @AKMcGlinchy.
Related Content