Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
KUT is experiencing technical difficulties on-air. We're sorry for the inconvenience.
00000175-b316-d35a-a3f7-bbdeff690001Agenda Texas is KUT's weekly report on the Texas Legislative session. Each week we'll take a deeper look into the policies being considered and explain what they could mean for you and your life. From transportation to education to the environment and everything in between.It's KUT's political podcast that lets you know what's happening under the dome and explains how it hits home.

Agenda Texas: What's a Point of Order?

Separate from the Supreme Court's recent decision, a federal court will decide on the constitutionality of Texas redistricting.
Separate from the Supreme Court's recent decision, a federal court will decide on the constitutionality of Texas redistricting.

Alright class: get out your pencils, it’s quiz time. 

True or False: If a bill is brought up for debate in the Texas House, and a majority of lawmakers support the bill, nothing can defeat it.

Time’s up.

Who said True? O.k. none of you get pudding after dinner.

Those that said false, tell everyone in earshot to bow to your superior intellect. A bill can be stopped in the Texas House by what’s called a Point of Order.

That's what happened Monday night during a debate on a bill that would fund the state’s 50-year water plan. It had majority support. But Democrats didn’t like an amendment added that could have forced other parts of the budget to be cut to fund water infrastructure. So Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Houston) pointed out that, according to the House rules, that bill wasn’t eligible to be heard until the 118th day of the legislative session. Monday was only the 112th.

"The rules have been used to advance legislation. Sometimes someone can use the rules creatively to move things forward when they can’t get their bills out of committee. And then of course rules are also used to slow things down," Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer (D-San Antonio) said.

Fischer has made a name for himself as a lawmaker that studies and uses the rules of the House to further his causes. He says in 2011, he called 16 points of order to slow down legislation he didn’t like.

"People who understand what the functions of the rules are, you never see them complain," Fischer said. "It’s the folks who think that because you have a mathematical majority that you should do anything around here. And simply, the rules don’t let you do that.”

Points of order can take many forms. From Rep. Sylvester Turner’s (D-Houston) Monday night, which showed the bill wasn’t yet eligible for a vote, to smaller infractions that Rep. Phil King (R-Weatherford) said doesn’t change the substance of a bill and shouldn’t be allowed to block its progress. King helped lead a successful effort to change the House rules to eliminate delays based on little more than typos.

That beginning of session rule change also included the creation of an electronic witness affirmation form that people can fill out using a tablet computer outside the different House committee rooms. People now fill out and submit all the information needed, with the goal of limiting typos and lost or incomplete information.

Rep. King told lawmakers in January the purpose of the rules isn't to kill a bill over a misspelled name.

"The purpose of rules, the purpose of the constitution, the purpose of our process is to make sure that the public and all the members have a complete, full understanding of all the legislation that’s brought before us," King said.

So far, King’s efforts appear to have limited the number of successful Points of Order this session. But it’s a powerful tool in a lawmaker’s toolbox. And one they’re not likely to give up any time soon.

Ben Philpott is the Managing Editor for KUT. Got a tip? Email him at Follow him on Twitter @BenPhilpottKUT.
Related Content