Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Supreme Court Won't Hear Challenge to Open Meetings Act


It’s the end of a nine-year legal battle over a Texas law requiring government meetings to be open and accessible to the public.  Today the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal that challenged the Texas Open Meetings Act

The Texas Municipal League argued the law violated free-speech rights, and that the punishments were too harsh: up to $500 fine and six months in jail for elected officials who deliberate together in secret. 

Former Texas solicitor general James Ho disagrees. He argued the case when it was before federal court.

“The whole purpose of the First Amendment is to protect citizens against government oppression. It’s not intended to protect government officials against citizen oversight," Ho said. 

The legislature regularly considers several open government bills each session, such as one filed this year by State Senator Kirk Watson(D-Austin). It  would allow elected officials to meet in online chat rooms that are publicly displayed and archived for later access. 

Nathan Bernier is the transportation reporter at KUT. He covers the big projects that are reshaping how we get around Austin, like the I-35 overhaul, the airport's rapid growth and the multibillion-dollar transit expansion Project Connect. He also focuses on the daily changes that affect how we walk, bike and drive around the city. Got a tip? Email him at Follow him on X @KUTnathan.
Related Content