Manchaca Road is no more.
A judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block the City of Austin from changing the name of the South Austin road to honor a Texas revolutionary.
The nearly yearlong battle to block the city stemmed from its public input process before a planned name change. The lawsuit from the group Leave Manchaca Alone was thrown out Thursday by State District Judge Dustin Howell on the grounds that he didn't have proper jurisdiction to rule on the case, the Austin American-Statesman first reported.
Proponents of the Menchaca name change say he frequented a spring outside the now-town of Manchaca during his time with the Texas Army.
Leave Manchaca Alone argued it was unclear whether that the town was named after him, suggesting the name "Manchac" stems from a Choctaw word, not Menchaca.
Attorney Roger Borgelt, who represented the group, said he was disappointed to see the case come so far only to end on that note.
"We're disappointed. That's really all I can say. We had come a long way and felt like we made progress," he said. "For it to be decided on a sort of jurisdictional issue is kind of disappointing, but that's what happened."
Retired Judge Bob Perkins, who championed the name change as far back as 2011, says he was elated to see the case thrown out.
"I think it's important in Texas history that we acknowledge all of our heroes – not just the Anglo-Saxons," he said.
The case started in 2016, when the nonprofit Justice for Menchaca paid $24,000 to have the road signs changed. To change the name, the city either needed approval from more than half of property owners along the road or sponsorship from a member of the Austin City Council.
Last September, Council Member Pio Renteria sponsored the ordinance to bring it to a vote. Council Member Ann Kitchen, who represents the district where the street is located, ultimately opposed the measure in the final vote.
After that, the Austin Transportation Department surveyed more than 1,700 property owners along the road. Out of the 63 respondents, 52 disagreed with the name change. The city then held a public hearing right before the Council vote in October.
Borgelt said his clients aren't ruling out an appeal, but that nothing was certain at this time.
"I would just stay tuned on that," he said.